Fake Trademark & IP Invoices
Official-looking invoices for trademark 'registration', 'renewal' or 'publication' from bogus bodies.
Last reviewed: 1 June 2026
What this scam is
Fake trademark and IP invoice scams send official-looking demands for trademark registration, renewal, or 'publication' fees from organisations that closely resemble — but are not — a genuine intellectual property office. These fraudulent invoices are sent to trademark applicants and patent holders, and are deliberately designed to be mistaken for legitimate correspondence from a national or international IP registry.
Trademark and patent applications are public records. From the moment a filing is made, the applicant's name and contact details become searchable on official IP databases. Scammers monitor these databases systematically, extracting applicant contact details and sending invoices within days or weeks of a filing — timed to feel like a natural part of the official registration process.
The invoices typically charge for services that are either entirely unnecessary (such as optional 'publication' in a private register), services that would normally be included within the official process at no extra cost, or services that do not exist at all. The amount is usually set at a level that feels plausible for an administrative fee — not so high as to trigger a large-payment review, but enough to generate significant revenue at scale across many targets.
How it works
Shortly after a trademark or patent application is lodged — often within a few weeks — the applicant receives correspondence from a body with a name that closely mimics an official IP office. Common naming patterns include 'World Trademark Register', 'International Patent Bureau', 'European Trademark Publication Office', or variations incorporating the words 'official', 'national', or 'registry'.
The correspondence is formatted to appear authoritative: it references the correct application number, the correct goods and services class, the correct applicant name, and quotes a deadline for payment to 'complete registration' or 'ensure publication'. Bank account details, usually in another country, are provided.
Because the timing and content feel like a natural step in the filing process, recipients — particularly those without specialist IP knowledge who are managing the process themselves — may pay without questioning whether the invoice is genuine. Some pay believing it is a required official fee; others pay fearing that non-payment will somehow jeopardise their application.
In reality, the payment accomplishes nothing. The 'publication' occurs only in an obscure private register of no commercial or legal value, or does not occur at all.
Why this scam works
IP invoice scams are particularly effective because trademark and patent applicants are often unfamiliar with the exact cost structure of the registration process. When a fee arrives that references the correct application details, the assumption is that it must be official — the scammer clearly has access to the right information.
The fraud also exploits the high value applicants place on their IP. A business that has invested in creating a brand or invention does not want to risk losing its protection over a missed administrative fee. This anxiety overrides the instinct to verify before paying.
Finally, the invoice format and framing are crafted to discourage scrutiny. Deadlines are tight, language is authoritative, and the invoice looks substantially similar to genuine correspondence from IP offices — which the recipient may never have seen before, making comparison difficult.
A typical pattern
A founder files a trademark application directly through their country's official IP office portal. Two weeks later, a letter arrives on official-looking headed paper from a body with a name similar to an international trademark authority. The letter references the correct application number, the correct trademark class, and advises that payment of a modest fee is required within 30 days to secure 'international publication'. The founder, unfamiliar with the normal fee structure, pays the fee. The payment goes to an overseas bank account and provides nothing of commercial or legal value.
Common red flags
- Invoice from a body with an official-sounding name that is not your actual IP office
- Fees for 'publication' or 'registration' in a register you did not request
- Timing closely follows a public IP filing
- Payment required to an overseas bank account
- Tight deadline threatening loss of rights or exclusivity
- References the correct application number but sender cannot be verified against official records
- Fine-print disclaimers acknowledging the body is a private commercial entity
- No mention of how the invoice relates to your specific IP office's fee schedule
- First contact is an invoice rather than a formal communication through your attorney
Sanitized example messages
Illustrative, sanitized examples. Personal details are replaced with placeholders such as [phone number] and [fake link].
Pay [amount] within 30 days to publish your trademark in the [official-sounding] International Register and ensure maximum protection.
NOTICE: Your trademark application [number] requires publication fee payment of [amount] to complete the registration process. Deadline: [date].
Your trademark [name] (Class [number]) has been accepted. To finalise registration and prevent loss of priority, please pay [amount] to the account below by [date].
As the official publication body for international trademarks, we require payment of [amount] to include [trademark name] in the next quarterly release of the World Trademark Index.
Your recent patent application requires an annual maintenance fee of [amount] payable to [body name] within 60 days to maintain active status.
RENEWAL NOTICE: Trademark [name] expires in 45 days. Renew now with [organisation] for [amount] to maintain continuous protection.
Common variations
- Fake trademark publication registers with official-sounding names
- Fictitious 'international' IP databases charging for listing
- Bogus renewal notices sent to trademark holders at renewal time
- Fake patent maintenance or annuity fee invoices
- Fraudulent 'watch service' subscriptions for trademark monitoring
- Misleading correspondence about domain name conflicts requiring IP action fees
How to verify before you act
All legitimate fees associated with your trademark or patent will be communicated through your appointed IP attorney or directly through the official IP office where you filed — not through unsolicited third-party correspondence.
- Verify the sender: look up the exact name of the sending organisation on your country's official IP office website. Be aware that official-sounding names are not enough — check whether the body has any official standing. - Contact your IP attorney: if you used one, forward any unsolicited invoice to your attorney for review before taking any action. - Contact your IP office directly: use contact details from the official website (not from the invoice) to ask whether the correspondence is genuine. - Check your application record: log in to your official IP office's online portal and review the actual status and fee schedule for your application. No legitimate fee will only be notified through a third-party invoice. - Do not pay from the invoice: never pay into bank details provided by an unsolicited third party without independent verification from your IP office.
Payment methods used
- Bank transfer
- Invoice payment
Who is usually targeted
- Businesses with trademarks/patents
- IP applicants
What to do immediately
- Do not pay any unsolicited IP invoice before verifying it with your IP attorney or official IP office
- Forward the invoice to your appointed attorney for review
- Check the official IP office website directly — using their verified address, not a link in the invoice — for information on fee structure
- If payment has been made, contact your bank immediately and report the transaction as potentially fraudulent
- Report the fraudulent notice to your national IP office and trading standards authority
- Warn other businesses in your industry or professional network who may also have filed applications recently
How to prevent it
- Route all IP-related correspondence through your appointed attorney before taking any action
- Maintain a list of the official IP offices and expected fee schedules for all jurisdictions where you have filings
- Brief relevant staff that IP filings generate a well-known wave of fraudulent invoices and to escalate any unfamiliar IP correspondence
- Never pay into bank details on an unsolicited IP invoice without independent verification
- Register with official IP office communication services to receive genuine notifications directly
- Apply a mandatory verification step before any IP-related payment — even small amounts
- Inform newly filing businesses in your network about this scam, as first-time filers are disproportionately targeted
Evidence to preserve
- The original invoice or notice with envelope and postmark if received by post
- Your genuine IP office correspondence showing the real fee schedule
- Any payment records if a transfer was made
- Your application records showing the correct application number and details
- Email headers if the notice was received digitally
Where to report it
- Action Fraud (UK) — UK national fraud & cybercrime reporting centre
- FTC ReportFraud (US) — US Federal Trade Commission fraud reports
- FBI IC3 (US) — US Internet Crime Complaint Center
- Scamwatch (Australia) — Australian competition & consumer reporting
- Your bank's fraud line — Use the number on the back of your card or in your banking app — never a number the caller gives you
Always verify reporting routes and emergency contacts on the official government or agency website for your country.
Frequently asked questions
Does the real IP office send extra invoices after I file?
Genuine fees come through your official IP office or your appointed representative. Unsolicited invoices from official-sounding third parties after a filing are a well-known and widespread scam. Your IP office's official website publishes its full fee schedule.
The invoice has my exact application number. Doesn't that mean it's genuine?
No. Application numbers, applicant names, and contact details are public record in trademark and patent databases. Scammers extract this information systematically and use it to make fraudulent invoices appear credible. Accurate application details are not evidence of official status.
What happens if we don't pay a fraudulent IP invoice?
Nothing that affects your IP rights. Your trademark or patent is registered with the official IP office under their fee structure. A fraudulent third-party invoice has no legal standing and non-payment carries no consequences for your application.
How can I tell a genuine IP renewal notice from a fraudulent one?
Genuine renewal notices will come from the specific IP office where your mark is registered, through your appointed attorney, or through your account on the official registry portal. They will not come as cold invoices from bodies you have never engaged with. When in doubt, check your account directly with the official IP office.
We paid a fraudulent invoice. Is our trademark now affected?
Your trademark registration with the official IP office is unaffected by payments made to fraudulent third parties. Contact your attorney to confirm the status of your registration through official channels. Report the fraudulent payment to your bank and relevant authorities.
Are these invoices legal?
Many jurisdictions have moved to prohibit the most misleading IP invoice practices. Some use disclaimers in fine print to preserve a veneer of legality. Regardless, payment obligations to unofficial bodies for IP services you did not request are generally unenforceable and reportable.
Should we use an IP attorney to manage trademark filings?
Using an appointed attorney has multiple benefits, including filtering all IP correspondence through a professional who can immediately identify fraudulent invoices. First-time self-filers are disproportionately targeted because they lack the experience to distinguish scam correspondence from genuine fee notices.